Planning the means of assessment
A means of assessment refers to a description of the ways student learning will be assessed in a given course. The means of assessment must be included in the course outline.
Planning a means of assessment
When making decisions about how your students will demonstrate their learning, keep in mind that:
Assessment tasks should be chosen in alignment with the learning outcomes you have planned for your course.
The weight of each assessment task should be appropriate in relation to the importance of the learning outcome(s) being assessed.
The means of assessment should be reasonable in terms of workload for your students and you. NB: If you are planning to implement less familiar assessment tasks or learning technologies, the time students—and you—might need to become familiar with them should be taken into account.
Resources to help you make decisions when planning the means of assessment:
Course Workload Estimator 2.0 (Wake Forest University): helps with calculating students’ workloads (time needed) when planning assessment tasks
McGill-supported technology tools for teaching (TLS website): offers an overview of available tools
In the next two sections, we offer example assessment tasks for inspiration and example means of assessment to illustrate how you can combine a selection of assessment tasks to support students’ achievement of the learning outcomes.
Example assessment tasks
A sound pedagogical practice is to allow students to demonstrate their learning in a variety of ways; thus, consider planning a variety of assessment tasks. These examples are offered for inspiration. They can be adapted for implementation in courses taught on campus, in a blended manner, and fully online.
Example means of assessment
The example means of assessment below are intended to provide inspiration for how you can combine a selection of assessment tasks to support students’ achievement of the learning outcomes.
Each example:
is made up of different combinations of assessment tasks.
begins with learning outcomes and is followed by an assessment task and explanation of how this task allows students to demonstrate their achievement of the learning outcomes.
concludes with a description of McGill-supported technology tools for implementing the assessment tasks.
We encourage you to mix and match the assessment tasks to best support student learning in your course(s).
Quizzes, short papers, timed exam
Quizzes, short papers, timed exam
Students will be able to recall basic concepts and definitions. | |
5 mini quizzes (3% each) or 7 quizzes and the best 5 count Tools: Use the Quizzes tool in myCourses to set up quizzes that auto-grade students’ submissions. Quizzes can be linked to the myCourses Grades tool. | 15% |
Students will be able to:
| |
2 short papers (20%, 25%) Tools: Have students submit their papers using the Assignments tool in myCourses and provide students with oral or written comments through the same tool in myCourses. Use the Rubrics tool in myCourses to create a rubric that you can attach to the assignment. | 45% |
Students will be able to:
| |
For a timed exam, students start it at a time that is convenient for them and once started, have a designated number of hours to complete it. Make it clear to students before they start the exam which materials are approved for consultation (e.g., course textbook, class notes, any book online). Tools: Use the Quizzes tool in myCourses to set up an exam with a time limit and a release window. | 40% |
Blog posts, peer feedback, video demonstration, learning portfolio
Students will be able to explain study results and implications to a lay audience. | |
2 short blog posts (10%, 15%) Writing two posts allows students to practice and receive feedback on a first assignment in order to improve for the second. Tools: Students submit their blog posts through the Assignments tool in myCourses. The instructor, Teaching Assistant(s), or Grader provides students with written or oral feedback comments and grades through the Assignments tool in myCourses, which is linked to the myCourses Grades tool. Alternatively, students submit their blog posts to a Discussion forum for viewing by the whole class. The instructor, Teaching Assistant, or Grader provide feedback comments and a grade in the Discussion forum, which is linked to the myCourses Grades tool. | 25% |
Students will be able to:
| |
Peer feedback on first blog post Tools: Assign students to private groups of three in myCourses Discussion forums. Each student provides feedback to the two peers in the group. All students in the group see each other's feedback. The instructor and Teaching Assistant(s) can access all groups. The instructor, Teaching Assistant(s), or Grader provides feedback comments and a grade in the Discussion forum, which is linked to the myCourses Grades tool. Large classes will benefit from using FeedbackFruits, a peer assessment tool that is integrated in myCourses. | 10% |
Students will be able to explain to a lay audience the science behind how X works. | |
Video demonstration of how X works
Students submit their topic to the instructor for approval to ensure students are working on different topics. The outline creates a structure in which students must plan their work. A low-stakes practice video allows students to become familiar with the technology. It also allows them to receive feedback comments that they can use to improve their work for the final video submission. Tools: Students post their outlines to a myCourses Discussion forum. The instructor and Teaching Assistant(s) can post oral or written feedback comments on the outlines. You can set the forum so that students see peers’ outlines once they have posted their own. A grade can also be assigned in the Discussion forum and linked to the myCourses Grades tool. Students submit the practice video using the Video Assignments tool in myCourses. The instructor and Teaching Assistant(s) can post feedback comments at specific places in the video. The demonstration showcase video can be posted in the Discussions tool in myCourses for the whole class to see. The instructor, Teaching Assistant(s) or Grader can provide oral or written feedback comments and a grade. The assignment can be linked to the myCourses Grades tool. | 45% |
Students will be able to:
| |
Learning portfolio Tools: Use the Portfolio tool in myCourses. | 20% |
Infographic, quizzes, take-home exam
Students will be able to illustrate processes. | |
Infographic Tools: Students can create their infographics using Microsoft Word or PowerPoint and then submit them as PDFs through the Assignments tool in myCourses. The instructor, Teaching Assistant(s) or Grader provides students with written or oral feedback comments and grades through the Assignments tool in myCourses, which is linked to the myCourses Grades tool. Alternatively, students post their infographics to a myCourses Discussion forum for viewing by the whole class. The instructor, Teaching Assistant(s) or Grader provides feedback comments and a grade in the Discussion forum, which is linked to the myCourses Grades tool. | 25% |
Students will be able to explain theoretical principles and concepts from the course. | |
3 quizzes (10% each) Tools: Use the Quizzes tool in myCourses to set up timed quizzes that can auto-grade students’ submissions. | 30% |
Students will be able to apply theoretical concepts to real-world problems. | |
Take-home exam with real world scenarios Take-home exams are exams that students can start, finish, and return to within a designated period of time (e.g., 48 or 72 hours). However, the exam itself should still be of a length and difficulty that would take a reasonable amount of time to complete (e.g., 3 hours). Make it clear to students before they start the exam which materials are approved for consultation (e.g., course textbook, class notes, any book online). Tools: Use the Assignments tool in myCourses and link it to the myCourses Grades tool. | 45% |
Team project (oral and written components), short written assignments, reflections
Students will be able to:
| |
Team project
Having students submit a proposal and workplan provides focus and encourages students to be accountable to one another. Team projects also have the potential to promote community. Tools: Students can collaborate using the Groups tool in myCourses, breakout rooms in Zoom, and various tools in Microsoft Teams. Peer assessment of teamwork can be done with FeedbackFruits. Students can submit their outlines through the Assignments tool in myCourses. For the oral presentation, students can use the Video Assignments tool or record themselves using a smartphone, tablet, or laptop, and share the recording in myCourses with the instructor (using the Assignments tool in myCourses) or the whole class (using the Discussion tool in myCourses). Students can also use Camtasia to record a slide show with audio. “Live” presentations can be done in Zoom. | 40% |
Students will be able to:
| |
3 short written assignments (15% each) Tools: Have students submit their writing through the Assignments tool in myCourses and provide students with oral or written comments through the same tool. Set up the assessment scheme using the Rubrics tool in myCourses. You can attach the rubric to the assignment and link the assignment to the myCourses Grades tool. | 45% |
Students will be able to:
| |
3 individual reflection questions/prompts (5% each) 1 = submitted on time; fewer than half the criteria met Tools: Have students submit their writing through the Assignments tool in myCourses and provide students with oral or written comments through the same tool. Set up the assessment scheme using the Rubrics tool in myCourses. You can attach the rubric to the assignment and link the assignment to the myCourses Grades tool. | 15% |
Quizzes, multi-stage term paper, discussions
Students will be able to:
| |
4 quizzes (10% each) Tools: Use the Quizzes tool in myCourses to set up short answer response questions. Short answers can be auto-graded in myCourses. The instructor, Teaching Assistant(s), or Grader can provide feedback comments and a grade on written responses (i.e., long answers). The Quizzes tool can be linked to the myCourses Grades tool. | 40% |
Students will be able to:
| |
Term paper submitted in stages
Multi-stage assignments encourage students to develop their ideas incrementally over time and avoid deferring work until the night before it's due. Asking students to provide evidence of their work is a strategy for promoting academic integrity. You do not have to provide feedback on all stages of the assignment. For example, you can give students a deadline for submitting a first draft and assign 3% of their grade for completion. Asking students to engage in peer feedback can be a way to build community in the class. Tools: Students can submit annotated bibliographies, draft papers, and final papers through the Assignments tool in myCourses. The instructor, Teaching Assistant(s), or Grader can provide oral and written feedback comments, and a grade with the Assignments tool, which can be linked to the myCourses Grades tool. Peer feedback can be set up in myCourses, for example, by using the Groups tool in myCourses and assigning two or more students to each group. Large classes will benefit from using FeedbackFruits, a peer assessment tool that is integrated in myCourses. | 40% |
Students will be able to:
| |
Participation in two discussions (2 x 10%) Tools: Use the myCourses Discussions tool. The instructor, Teaching Assistant(s), or Grader can provide oral and written feedback comments, and a grade in the Discussion forum, which can be linked to the myCourses Grades tool. Increase student-to-student interaction by allowing students to rate each other’s posts by using a five-star rating system or up/down voting in myCourses. |
Flexible assessment
Flexible assessment is a strategy that allows students a decision-making role in how their learning is assessed. The flexibility can pertain to the type of strategy used to assess students’ learning as well as the weight of the assessment tasks. The following examples illustrate implementations of flexible assessment at two Canadian universities.
Example 1
Flexible assessment in two large upper-level undergraduate courses at a large research-intensive university
In a presentation for members of McGill’s Assessment and Feedback Group, staff from Teaching and Learning Services, and McGill’s then Office for Students with Disabilities, Dr. Candice Rideout, Associate Professor in the Faculty of Land and Food Systems at the University of British Columbia, shared an approach to flexible assessment that she designed and uses with students in her large, undergraduate courses.
Read about her presentation: Flexible assessment: One instructor’s implementation in a large class (Teaching for Learning blog)
Read her publication: Rideout, C. (2018). Students’ choices and achievement in large undergraduate classes using a novel flexible assessment approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(1), 68-78.
Example 2
Flexible assessment in an entry-level statistics course
In a session at the University of Waterloo 2021 Teaching and Learning Conference (April 28-29), Michael Wallace, Statistics & Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, and Kris Siy, Art of Problem Solving, presented their implementation of flexible assessment in three sections of a statistics course.
View a video recording (~15 minutes) of the presentation.
Abstract
Flexible assessment is a form of flexible learning where students are offered choice in how they are assessed. Examples include optional assessments, multiple weighting schemes, or a choice of assessment type. Despite being an important example of flexible learning more generally, flexible assessment has received comparatively little attention in the educational literature[8] and studies of it have reported varying conclusions.[9][10][11][12]
Funded by a LITE Seed Grant, we conducted a study of flexible assessment in an entry-level statistics course at the University of Waterloo in Fall 2018. The course offered a flexible grading scheme where some assessments could be missed without penalty. Using two surveys, students were invited to discuss why they did (or did not) miss an assessment, whether (and how) the flexible grading scheme affected their studies, and if they perceived benefits 'beyond the classroom' (such as to their health and well-being).
We present initial findings from the study, based on data from approximately 300 students in the class (75% of total enrolment). We highlight common themes among the reasons given for missing or writing an assessment, and discuss the relationship between missed assessments and performance in the course as a whole. Overall, students believed flexible assessment was beneficial to their academic performance (both in the course under study and their other courses) as well as to their general well-being.
Take-aways
Students perceive flexible assessments as being beneficial. These benefits are not limited to academic performance in the course in which the flexible grading scheme is used, but also in their other courses and more generally to their health and well-being.
Missed assessments were most commonly attributed to time limitations, feeling ill-prepared, or to help reduce strain on well-being. Those who wrote assessments perceived them to help maximize grades, test knowledge, or prepare them for later assessments.
Most respondents (54.7%) reported they engaged differently with the course as a result of the flexible grading scheme, such as feeling reduced stress or pressure (26.2%), putting in less effort (12%), or working more effectively (5%).
References
[1]Kennedy, D., Hyland, Á, & Ryan, N. (2007). Writing and using learning outcomes: A practical guide. In Implementing Bologna in your Institution. Raabe Academic Publishers, p. 13.
[2]Adapted from Barkley, E. (2010). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. Jossey-Bass, p. 274. Available from the McGill Library: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/mcgill/detail.action?docID=469208
[3]Bean, J. (2001). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. Jossey-Bass. Available from the McGill Library: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/mcgill/detail.action?docID=697914
[4]Bean, J. (2001). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. Jossey-Bass. Available from the McGill Library: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/mcgill/detail.action?docID=697914, p.109
[5]Bean, J., Drenk, D., & Lee, F. (1982). Microtheme strategies for developing cognitive skills. New Directions for Teaching and Learning: Teaching Writing in all Disciplines, 12, pp. 27-38.
[6]Direct quotations from Wikipedia database. (n.d.). Multiple Choice. Retrieved April 11, 2023 from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_choice
[7]Joughin, G. (2010). A short guide to oral assessment. Leeds Met Press, Leeds Metropolitan University/University of Wollongong. https://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/id/eprint/2804/1/100317_36668_ShortGuideOralAssess1_WEB.pdf
[8]Rideout, C. (2018). Students’ choices and achievement in large undergraduate classes using a novel flexible assessment approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(1), 68-78.
[9]Cook, A. (2001). Assessing the use of flexible assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(6), 539-549.
[10]MacDermott, R. J. (2013). The impact of assessment policy on learning: Replacement exams or grade Dropping. The Journal of Economic Education, 44(4), 364-371.
[11]Pacharn, P., Bay, D., & Felton, S. (2013). The impact of a flexible assessment system on students’ motivation, performance and attitude. Accounting Education, 22(2), 147-167.
[12]Sewell, E. (2004). Grade dropping: An empirical analysis. Journal of Economic Education, 35(1), 24-34.
Have a question that was not answered in this article? Visit our FAQs.
While this resource is accessible worldwide, McGill University is on land which has served and continues to serve as a site of meeting and exchange amongst Indigenous peoples, including the Haudenosaunee and Anishinabeg nations. Teaching and Learning Services acknowledges and thanks the diverse Indigenous peoples whose footsteps mark this territory on which peoples of the world now gather. This land acknowledgment is shared as a starting point to provide context for further learning and action.
While this resource is accessible worldwide, McGill University is on land which has served and continues to serve as a site of meeting and exchange amongst Indigenous peoples, including the Haudenosaunee and Anishinabeg nations. Teaching and Learning Services acknowledges and thanks the diverse Indigenous peoples whose footsteps mark this territory on which peoples of the world now gather. This land acknowledgment is shared as a starting point to provide context for further learning and action.
McLennan Library Building 3415 McTavish Street Suite MS-12(ground level), Montreal, Quebec H3A 0C8 | Tel.: 514-398-6648 | Fax: 514-398-8465 | Email: tls@mcgill.ca